|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 3:31:30 GMT
how old are you 10? dude do u guys have real lives outside of pokemon?, cuz i mean its not the greatest thing. and i dont see why u think that ur so much better than the other members, i bet half of them are older then you.
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 3:33:05 GMT
crap sorry bout that, i told my bro bout your game, and so i let him go on to the forums with my name. sorry bout that, im gonna change my password now i tihnk.
|
|
|
Post by V Faction on Apr 25, 2004 3:34:41 GMT
Your brother... right.. Well, I don't think changing your password is going to keep your brother at bay.
Also, FYI, some members ARE 10. Don't worry CC, I got your back.
|
|
|
Post by Shadolf on Apr 25, 2004 3:38:41 GMT
FYI, I am not ten. I am older than you even. And there is nothing wrong with some ten year olds (CC for example).
And if Pokemon sucks so much, why the hell are you here?
Yes, we have lives outside of Pokemon for Christ's sake. IF we didn't, the game would have been done in March. It's not even nearing completion. I manage to have fun on here, hang out with friends, work, and keep straight A's in school, so don't be saying that I have no life. I am managing well.
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 3:58:13 GMT
lol ur not older then me, we are the same age jeesh
|
|
|
Post by Shadolf on Apr 25, 2004 4:04:22 GMT
Check it:
December 23, 1987
Yours? March 2, '88?
And quit acting immature. You sure as hell don't act sixteen. This is your final warning.
|
|
|
Post by DeltaSuicune on Apr 25, 2004 4:46:03 GMT
*cough cough*
Using chat language on forums is generally considered being immature since it reflects a) the time you bother putting into your commentary b) your social life and the amount of time spent online, and c) your intellectual capability limits. So just in the odd case that you actually thought using shoutbox and chat language on forums is acceptable, it's not.
~DS
|
|
|
Post by systematic on Apr 25, 2004 9:02:08 GMT
(Whee! .. even though I'm 11 now. Still, whee!)
Now I don't feel half as bad for telling you off for bumping topics. And ditto on the intellectual capabilities comment, Delta. And punctuation wouldn't hurt. It's not like you're typing while a bomb is going to go off in 10-seconds, really.
|
|
|
Post by mattgcn on Apr 25, 2004 12:25:17 GMT
Burned by someone alot younger OUCH! If I had my brain in the A+ position when on the computer, I'd do it too. Man, and I thought you couldn't match Minty.
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 17:21:25 GMT
ok i dont see how that is a burn, but im gonna be the mature one and stop this little thing.
|
|
|
Post by Shadolf on Apr 25, 2004 17:56:54 GMT
It's about time...
|
|
|
Post by BuffyBoy on Apr 25, 2004 18:36:36 GMT
Alright... The next person to go off topic on this thread is going to make me very cranky...
This is the pokedex order. Talk about the pokedex ORDER!
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 18:57:33 GMT
ya ok, so whats the idea your working on rightnow with it
|
|
|
Post by mattgcn on Apr 25, 2004 19:11:25 GMT
(oh good, it's over? Thank you for stepping up there)
I think we were gonna go along the lines of the old dexes in the order, but I think that it was planned to put most of the two-stages before the three-stages, am i right?
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 19:18:16 GMT
ok i mean, do this....
starters for all the games, then all the like pokemon form the games, then fossils, then legendary's
i think thats the best way to do it...and then just find a way to order the main pokemon part
|
|
|
Post by Shadolf on Apr 25, 2004 19:23:10 GMT
First, I think we are doing these different Pokedex modes:
Numerical order (1-501) Full Treasures order (compared to the GSC mode in GSC) Regional orders (First Taion, then Hohpo, and then Johto. Listed by the Pokemon you encounter in those regions)****** Alphabetical (obviously) And any other modes used i nthe past official games.
*****Regional orders: I don't know how exactly to set these up. In a full numerical-like mode, with 501 spots, separated by regions? Or three different modes, the Taion, Hohpo, and Johto modes, each with the amount of Pokemon found there (and any evos that aren't, even if they are found somewhere else)? Of course, any Pokemon that are found in two regions could overlap, and be listed in both modes, if it was set up that way.
_______________________________
Next thing: Pokemon Order within them.
Numerical: Obvious. We take our large pic right now, plug the Pokemon in with some numbers, and there we go.
The others (GSC-like mode, regional mode):
-Starters -Beginning Pokemon found early (like the Pidgeys and Poochyenas of the games) -Any various Pokemon, evo lines and some single stages, some of them possibly being subgrouped by type and/or location. Things like the Eevee and Draconid lines next to each other. -Later found Pokemon, and stronger Pokemon (things such as Kangaskhan in GSC). I don't know if old starters should be placed here, like in GSC, or if they should be mixed in with the other various lines -Fossils (Includes Omanyte, Omastar, Kabuto, Kabutops, Lileep, Cradily, Anorith, Armaldo, and our new ones) -Legendary Trios (in our case, quintet) -Other legendaries (Lugia, Ho-oh, Albinos, etc.) -Then Mew, Celebi, Jirachi, Deoxys, and Reirei
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 19:26:27 GMT
sounds good. and if you need me to do anything ill help you with it.
|
|
|
Post by V Faction on Apr 25, 2004 19:52:21 GMT
Not only is this an order topic, but it's also a good resource for the names!
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 20:19:23 GMT
www.pokecommunity.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=4081^Pullic-the bullet pokemon Psychic/normal ^ its like the new porygon? didnt know if u had one cuz i mean u need one. adn i didnt see one. max stats- hp-412 attack-187 defense-388 speed-178 special A-214 special D-233 i know u dont need anymore ideas, but i was wondering if u did have a new kind of porygon or sumtin?
|
|
|
Post by sneasel on Apr 25, 2004 20:22:32 GMT
Nope. No new Porygon-like Pokémon. But neither did RS.
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 20:26:14 GMT
oh...i just thought you guys might make one
|
|
|
Post by sneasel on Apr 25, 2004 20:33:11 GMT
Nope. Sorry. ;D
|
|
|
Post by awkwardsilencer on Apr 25, 2004 20:48:33 GMT
its fine lol, bagons still the best.
|
|
|
Post by sneasel on Apr 25, 2004 20:52:52 GMT
Meh, I prefer Trapinch. Besides, Flygon pwns Salamence.
|
|
|
Post by Shadolf on Apr 25, 2004 21:07:45 GMT
What is "pwn" anyway? I never knew
|
|