|
Post by Tropiuslover on Aug 30, 2007 15:13:15 GMT
Stats updated.
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 1, 2007 2:31:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by themuffinman on Sept 1, 2007 4:12:13 GMT
I like them. The first is cute and helpless looking but the third is huge a wicked monster. However I think that going from the cute little slugs to the big monster snails is a bit too big of a gap. I think the second line would keep it from being such a huge gap but that's just my two cents.
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 1, 2007 5:54:40 GMT
Great, but make the eyes in angle.
|
|
|
Post by FMY on Sept 1, 2007 11:46:55 GMT
Awesome! I most certainly like them. They make me think of Gyarados: a weak basic pokémon with a very strong evolution.
The middle-stage snail looks good too (I don't see why you don't like it), but of course, if it were in the game we would lose the Gyarados effect.
|
|
|
Post by BonzaiRob on Sept 1, 2007 18:40:20 GMT
We have a lot of three-stage bugs, a two-stage one would be more unique. Maybe these could be found in caves..?
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 1, 2007 18:42:25 GMT
We'll just have both the lines. Ans I said before, "The more, the merrier."
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 1, 2007 21:12:26 GMT
I like them. The first is cute and helpless looking but the third is huge a wicked monster. However I think that going from the cute little slugs to the big monster snails is a bit too big of a gap. I think the second line would keep it from being such a huge gap but that's just my two cents. Good point, so if most people decide to have the slug/snail line be s stage then I will probably remake the middle slug and give it a small shell. I noticed that it is actually bigger than the 3rd stage. XD Great, but make the eyes in angle. They are at an angle, top-right to the right, top-left to the left, bottom-right to the bottom-right, and bottom-left to the bottom-left. I made it like that so it was like it was looking in all direction and would have a large field of vision. What angle did you want it to look at? Awesome! I most certainly like them. They make me think of Gyarados: a weak basic pokémon with a very strong evolution. The middle-stage snail looks good too (I don't see why you don't like it), but of course, if it were in the game we would lose the Gyarados effect. I prefer the Gyarados effect to having it three-stage, actually. It more unique considering that most of the bug lines are three-stage. And I don't like the slug-thing because it is bigger than its evolution. It also is fat and chunky looking. :/ We have a lot of three-stage bugs, a two-stage one would be more unique. Maybe these could be found in caves..? Yeah, I was trying to make it look like it should go in caves.
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 2, 2007 10:13:17 GMT
But I think it should be in more angle.
And Oddish is bigger than Belossom! This is crazy! XD
|
|
|
Post by FMY on Sept 2, 2007 10:27:32 GMT
Well, they're just sprites. They don't say anything about the actual pokémon size.
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 2, 2007 10:48:02 GMT
No, Oddish is 1'08" and Belossom is 1'04". XD
|
|
|
Post by BonzaiRob on Sept 2, 2007 13:10:39 GMT
Sprites aren't in scale, is what FMY was saying. Otherwise, like I've said before, Groudon and Natu wouldn't mix. Belossom is an oddity though.
|
|
|
Post by FMY on Sept 2, 2007 15:00:25 GMT
Indeed, I thought he was referring to the Oddish sprite being bigger than that of Bellossom. I didn't know oddish really was smaller than Belossom.
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 2, 2007 20:04:21 GMT
Okay, I see what you're saying. But, let's vote, middle stage or not?: Yes: 0 No: 1 I voted no.
|
|
|
Post by BuffyBoy on Sept 2, 2007 20:45:17 GMT
No middle stage.
|
|
|
Post by FMY on Sept 2, 2007 21:48:21 GMT
No. I want a Gyarados-snail!
|
|
|
Post by mattgcn on Sept 2, 2007 22:35:57 GMT
Gyarasnail
Though the eyes creep the hell out of me.
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 2, 2007 22:57:45 GMT
Yes! Two stage wins! 4:0
|
|
|
Post by BonzaiRob on Sept 4, 2007 20:59:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 4, 2007 22:31:59 GMT
Nice, but its beak looks strange. I think either its eyes should point down more or its beak should point up more. It kinda seems dark for a day bird, too. :/ By the way, I'd finished the slug's info, but something went wrong with my computer and I lost everything!
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 5, 2007 10:32:16 GMT
I like it, everything looks great, but I agree with MLS, it is indeed a little too dark for a daytime bird.
|
|
|
Post by BonzaiRob on Sept 5, 2007 11:18:25 GMT
Well it is a magpie P what colour do you think the dark blue should be instead?
|
|
|
Post by Tropiuslover on Sept 5, 2007 13:52:31 GMT
Dark blue, but a little lighter dark blue.
|
|
|
Post by mls on Sept 5, 2007 19:54:56 GMT
Dark blue, but a little lighter dark blue. Yeah, it was just a bit to dark a little light would be good.
|
|
|
Post by BonzaiRob on Sept 11, 2007 10:27:01 GMT
|
|